15 december 2005

En ganska positiv artikel i Nature om Wikipedia: Wiki's wild world : Nature Man drar slutsatsen att "the accuracy of science in Wikipedia is surprisingly good" och inte innehåller särskilt många fler fel än den ansedda Encyclopedia Brittanica. I Nature sägs: "Nature would like to encourage its readers to help. The idea is not to seek a replacement for established sources such as the Encyclopaedia Britannica, but to push forward the grand experiment that is Wikipedia, and to see how much it can improve." Intressant!
(Nature 438 , 15 december 2005)

posted by åsa @ torsdag, december 15, 2005